Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robin T's avatar

Good question. I think audiences will accept anything that fills an emotional need in that given moment. The brain will do anything to alleviate boredom.

That being said, any kind of content that can attract and maintain attention will always have a presence, AI generated or not. The novelty aspect of AI is here for a limited time and it will produce much of the same stuff people on social media like now. And this will only propagate and become more recursive. Consider YouTube videos and AI generated playlists on a given topic—there already are AI generated playlist that regurgitate the same content over and over again. It generates clicks—people seem to enjoy it.

I catch myself trying to identify patterns on AI generated voice over work on a given thing. Even I miss the human element of sorts.

Expand full comment
Alex McFarland's avatar

Great piece. It was great to see your stack breakdown - that's definitely THE quintessential AI writing stack (NotebookLM, Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity). I use the exact same combination in my workflows. Don't have much experience with fiction tools like Sudowrite.

The real key here is learning how to effectively use AI. While I understand why some groups resist it, the longer anyone waits to learn how to augment their work with these tools, the harder it becomes later. (There are exceptions and content that I will always prefer to be 100% human.)

There's also plenty of AI-generated slop floating around, but let's be honest - the internet was already flooded with mediocre content before AI came along. AI has just increased the volume of low-quality material, but that's true for virtually everything online these days. In a way, this actually helps truly excellent content (whether AI-assisted or not) stand out even more. Spend just a little time writing with AI tools, and you can immediately spot who understands how to use them effectively and who doesn't.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts